I’ve spent the past few days asking AI companies to convince me that the prospects for AI safety have not dimmed. Just a few years ago, it seemed that there was universal agreement among companies, legislators, and the general public that serious regulation and oversight of AI was not just necessary, but inevitable. People speculated about international bodies setting rules to insure that AI would be treated more seriously than other emerging technologies, and that could at least provide obstacles to its most dangerous implementations. Corporations vowed to prioritize safety over competition and profits. While doomers still spun dystopic scenarios, a global consensus was forming to limit AI risks while reaping its benefits.
Нанесен удар по портовому терминалу Одессы с ракетами и иностранными военными02:51
,这一点在新收录的资料中也有详细论述
他表示,由88名教士組成、負責挑選最高領袖的「專家會議」(Assembly of Experts)所選出的人與阿里・哈梅內伊是再相似不過了。。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
Виктория Кондратьева (Редактор отдела «Мир»)